Autism, famously fuzzy, seems to defy most attempts at definition, treatment, understanding. It's often easier to spot the ideas and writing about it that don't make sense than to find and fully embrace those that do. That's what makes writers such as Emily Willingham and Steve Silberman and Amy Harmon so invaluable: They show us the possibilities within the confounds; that the fuzziness is richly textured.
So too does a new story by Gareth Cook*, a Pulitzer-winning journalist whose article "The Autism Advantage" appeared today in the early-online version of this coming Sunday's New York Times Magazine. This wonderfully smart, richly reported, finely turned piece explores with unusual skill what may be autism's central paradox — the difficulty of discerning a person who meets the world through such different perceptual, social, and communicative prisms. Take, for instance, this story from the principal of a school that has embraced the task of teaching children with autism:
Get the whole thing at The Autism Advantage.
*Disclosure: I first came to know Gareth's work when he was editing the Ideas column at the Boston Globe. Later he took over editing of Mind Matters, a Scientific American online department I founded. And yet later I signed a book contract with an editor who happens to be married to Mr. Cook. I feel confident I'd be highly impressed with this autism feature anyway. The Lego story alone: It's not every day one comes across something that beautiful.