David Chang Shares the Secrets Behind Momofuku's Delicious Success
Released on 11/20/2014
(audience applauds)
(upbeat music)
In 2004 when Noodle Bar opened
to lukewarm reviews, we decided to go for broke.
We stopped serving the ramen bar standards
and started cooking whatever we felt like.
It was a creative atmosphere, where there are no bad ideas.
I was facing foreclosure, I had nothing to lose.
The bank wanted everything. Total failure,
or complete turnaround were the only options.
Luckily, it was the latter.
After Momofuku opened, we tried to bring that go for broke
mentality to everything we do.
Every dish, concept, and new venture.
Taking risks leads to good new food.
Food so good no one is talking at the table.
That's what I see at our restaurants,
that's what my chef sees,
and we want it to be completely silent.
Even though music's playing,
that's the best noise a chef can hear.
When the customer's not just satisfied, but they're static:
dazed and confused by what they've just tasted.
(audience laughs)
You don't want people to talk, it's not good enough.
After they've eaten something you want them to be like,
Oh my God, what the fuck just happened?
(audience laughs)
Those types of dishes don't come easily.
They often have to be built up and torn down
dozens and dozens of times.
And even when there's a chance they won't connect
with the audience, but would that connection
between the chef and the diner
give the restaurant their vitality?
It's this trust, this give and take.
In over ten years I've learned
what it means to be a business owner and a boss.
So now I place high value on systems,
accountability, and organisation
so we can get that moment more and more.
Every day, my cooks and chefs
have to balance contradictory ideas:
the anarchy that makes the best dishes,
and the order that makes the best business.
It's a paradox that we'll never be able to
easily understand or execute,
because there's a push and pull
between order and creativity.
It's like I'm mandating that we capture lightning
in a bottle, and then carefully label and store that bottle
on the shelf, it's asking the impossible.
As a chef, you're used to being asked to do the impossible.
You're constantly striving to be the best.
The desire sometimes manifests
itself as a kitchen full of yelling.
I can tell you personally, that kind of kitchen space
is where nobody wants to say anything.
They're just too scared.
Any kind of creative process reaches a standstill.
For a dish to grow, you need feedback.
If there's one totalitarian opinion
in the kitchen, creativity withers.
On the other side of the spectrum,
you can have a free-thinking kitchen environment,
like this hippie free-love stuff.
A kitchen where all ideas are good ideas,
and every dish is executed.
This feel-good zone is equally quiet
because cooks are afraid to express criticism.
Constructive criticism is a crucial ingredient
in any good dish.
There's dishes where people just don't know what to say.
Great dishes need to run a gauntlet for ideas
that is both tough, and fair.
I used to go back and forth about whether I needed
to be more militant, or more relaxed.
But I've realised our restaurants work best
when they're both simultaneously.
An environment where cooks have thick skin,
and a high level of empathy.
Being in that zone, that fleeting moment
where everything is in balance is rare.
In that moment, food becomes more delicious.
It can be a 10 or 20 course degustation, or a fish taco.
That zone is when you're delighting customers.
It's like balancing a tipping chair.
We've had periods of too much doubt
when we were constantly over-correcting,
and failing to hit that mark.
If there wasn't enough efficiency and structure,
we'd bring in a sous-chef, an enforcer,
a hard-ass, a drill sergeant.
Someone that came from an old school,
French, punch you in the face kind of kitchen.
And those kitchens really did exist.
Not so much these days.
If there was too much structure and order,
we'd bring in somebody that just came back
from cooking abroad, from a magical place
like Mugaritz in San Sebastian,
Fat Duck in England, in Bray,
or elBulli in Roses, Spain.
With their mind full of new ideas,
and their heads in the clouds.
In the golden, early days of Noodle Bar
it was just me and a few cooks,
and once we ditched the gyoza and the edamame,
we started serving dishes with the techniques I learned
at various New York top restaurants,
and cooking abroad in Japan.
We created refined food with extraordinary ingredients
that wouldn't normally be found in a restaurant
in our price range.
I just believed good food should be for everybody,
I got tired of cooking food on the Upper Side
for really rich people.
And if you travel abroad, you'll see that good food
is for really everybody, and cheaply.
And we temporarily found that sweet spot
between polished and uninhibited.
We honed in on a particular kind of deliciousness
that arose from that conflict
of my high-brow and low-brow tastes.
Just because cooks make fancy food at fancy restaurants,
doesn't mean that's what they want to eat.
If anything, Noodle Bar was an expression
of fuck you, this is what I'm cooking.
(audience laughs)
Not exactly the classic definition of hospitality,
but I felt that hospitality needed a kick in the ass.
We were in pursuit of a new kind of hospitality
that was meaningful to us and the diner.
We happened to stumble upon it at Sohm Bar.
At Sohm Bar, my second restaurant,
I was really trying to find my voice
and plan, in fact, for Momofuku, that would establish itself
something other than a one-hit-wonder, which Momofuku was.
This meant I had to reach further, work harder,
risk more than I ever had at Noodle Bar.
And I could not have failed bigger
than I did with this Asian burrito.
I'm not going to put a photo up.
(audience laughs)
In the end, it was blessing in disguise.
It allowed me to feel completely free in creating
new combinations of food, flavors and techniques.
I had nothing to lose, we were liberated.
If we were going to go out of business
again, we were going to do it in style
with that very real perspective of losing everything
including the shirt off my back.
Following the culinary status quo,
the traditions of what I should
and shouldn't do, just didn't matter anymore.
All our bad ideas started to seem like good ideas.
And somewhere in that mess, I knew
we could find something really delicious.
Like most cooks, and people who like good food
I liked sea urchin, I love sea urchin.
I wanted to serve it at Sohm Bar,
but in a different way than serve it raw or on rice,
as you might see in a Japanese restaurant.
Those are very well understood
ways of eating it, and I thought cooking it
would be an abomination.
Cooked uni, you know, you see it sometimes in pasta
or risotto, but that's not something
I wanted to do either.
So, I started working on a dish.
Eventually, I realized I could maintain and highlight
the purity of the sea urchin,
by serving it in a dangerously contrasting environment.
I cooked black top yolkar pearls,
like you'd see in bubble tea, and pineapple juice,
and served them in bowl ripping hot.
Way hotter than anybody should ever eat.
I had a deal with trying to get the best sea urchin
at the time, because Provares don't want to sell
a place called Momofuku, especially with really good
Santa Barbara sea urchin.
And I put that next to the tapioca.
We turned tofu into this whipped cream,
very light, in a cloud, and put that on the uni.
There was furikake, this Japanese rice seasoning,
scallions, yuzo kosho for citrus-y spice,
apple juice for sweetness, which is also high in malic acid
just sort of opens up your palette.
It was a full throttle dish,
that never should have worked.
And I would never have done this dish
in any other state of mind.
And I would not have made it,
it, it just made me feel like I needed to vomit, you know?
(audience laughs)
Trying to serve something really delicious,
and trying to vomit because it was hot and cold,
it was crunchy and soft, sweet and spicy.
But after dozens and dozens of iterations
the last one felt like magic.
This dish was the catalyst for the rebirth of Sohm Bar,
which launched Sohm Bar from being this
really failed venture of an Asian burrito,
into eventually a New York Times three star restaurant.
And we kept on pushing, and pushing, and pushing
where we reached its highest, number 26 in the world.
And again, it's like, that's something I found in myself
feeling that nausea, that I have to vomit,
is actually something I found in every dish
that has been really instrumental in my life. (laughs)
(audience laughs and applauds)
You know?
And that's sort of what I'm trying to
all of my chefs to do, right?
That's for me to understand, and not everybody wants
to go down that path because it's a hard road
and I feel like I'm growing when I push myself
through those limits, emotionally.
And I get the best out of myself.
But, there's some people that don't understand that.
And they didn't understand that dish.
Critics liked it, chefs loved it,
but it's hard to explain to younger cooks,
or new people, how to make a dish like that
because you sort of have to lose yourself.
All our restaurants, for the most part, are open kitchens.
You can see everything: how they eat, and how they react.
And I can always change a few things
to evoke a different response.
Little more spicy, a little different knife cut
on a vegetable, different texture, didn't matter.
Because I can sort of tailor it as we go.
And I always try to go back to that uni dish
because there are two things at the same time
and somewhere in that dichotomy
was the secret path of new deliciousness.
Again, at that time, I did not know
how to explain any of this, I still don't know if I do.
But as we continue to grow,
I can no longer be omnipresent at the restaurants.
Each restaurant is a collaboration
between myself and the chefs.
Cooking is hard enough, managing people,
for me, is next to impossible.
Especially since I can't dangle an attractive bonus,
stock options, in front of them as an incentive.
I can only promise they will get better at their craft,
learn better techniques, and be part of a winning team.
So, I learned to let go a little bit
and give chefs the tools to find the balance on their own.
Recently, one of my head chefs put this dish on the menu.
A beef tongue sandwich, on rye, with bone marrow soup.
And, I can't remember what exactly happened
other than I saw it in service, and I lost my shit.
(audience laughs)
And he loved the dish.
And it just was, the pick up was stupid
it was too long, and for what went in it
there wasn't a return.
And, you know, like most young dishes
to a young chefs heart, it plays
upon something he grew up eating.
But it was too over-the-top, it doesn't look complicated
but there's a lot of stuff going on there.
It's too complicated.
It relied on nostalgia, instead of actual appeal.
Talking about its story adds up,
but just because a dish makes sense
doesn't mean it's going to work.
And it just definitely didn't work.
The bone marrow soup, your fried cornichons,
I still can't believe we served it.
And worst of all, it was a safe move for him.
He put nothing at stake, he was not reaching
for high or low, he was reaching for the middle.
Which I am vehemently against.
He wasn't trying to make people forget where they were,
he wasn't trying to transport them to that level of ecstasy
that I want, he wasn't risking anything.
When I was younger, and didn't know any better
I would have thrown that dish across the restaurant,
in a full crowded restaurant, in a fit of rage.
But, this moment in time, in the restaurant,
I just chilled out and I decided to let it play out.
I told him to look at the sales,
I told him more importantly look at the plates coming back
to the kitchen because that tells you everything.
And I knew there would be too many
half eaten dishes of beef tongue and bone marrow soup.
He wasn't cooking for the customer;
he was making the dish for himself.
Even though it looked a little different,
you could get those flavors at any Jewish delicatessen.
And I wanted him to take those flavors to a whole new level
or make it the best version anyone had ever seen,
and that's the mindset you have to have.
I firmly believe that.
It was neither.
Ultimately, he took it off on his own accord.
I didn't have to humiliate him,
and if I had demanded he remove the dish
it would have crushed him.
He wouldn't have learned anything from that experience,
and I would've lost one of the most talented cooks
I had ever hired or had the pleasure of working with.
And we worked and we worked on it, trying to get him
to think about flavors and textures and making food
that would evoke that response from a customer.
And I wasn't looking for immediate return on this investment
it's not instant gratification, and that's hard for a chef
because we get into this business,
because we want everything to be instant.
You know, the here and the now.
But I'm trying to see both short and long term plays.
Long term, he's going to learn
to better critique his own dishes.
And this is a dish that he came up next, a few months later.
And he's trying to build his confidence.
And this is one of the best dishes I've ever had.
And it's sort of the same thing, it's a sandwich.
It's an open faced sandwich, there's texture
from the pickles hears of palm on top,
there's the sardines for a little bit of fat,
and Hozon which we'll taste a little bit later.
It's just a great, great dish,
and very simple and very complicated.
So, I try to make sure that we teach failure
and trying to get better at teaching failure,
we needed to systemize what we were doing.
So in 2010, we launched our Culinary Lab.
And we were in the pursuit of trying to find anything,
we actually had no idea what the Hell was going on.
It was sort of in vogue to have a lab at the time,
and it's hard to fail, intentionally fail,
when you have dinner service, you have customers,
you have plumbing disasters,
they're just the worst things that can happen.
And then in the lab, I could create a structure
where there was this go for broke mentality every day,
where we could document it and take this scientific
approach to food that we had never done before.
This freedom of failure
lead to the creation of Hozon and bonji.
This project started considering every day items
in our kitchen that we didn't quite understand.
Katsuobushi, which is used to make Japanese dashi,
soy sauce, misos, were fundamental,
are fundamental in Japanese ingredients.
But we didn't really know how they were made
and we didn't know if we could make them
in the East Village instead of Japan.
So I had the bright idea that our goal
was to make the best versions of that in the world.
After going to Japan many times,
and seeing how they are making it,
I was like we can do this.
And we started to make soy sauce,
and then we realised, can we make it with something else?
Could we swap it out for New York State grains,
legumes, and proteins that are based locally?
As far as we know, this was the first time
anyone tried to substitute these ingredients.
We wanted to pay homage to these classic Japanese culinary
staples, but at the same time we wanted to destroy them
because we felt we could do it better.
And we're not there yet but we're going to get there.
To us, replacing those traditions
meant steering away and creating our own.
After all, if you fundamentally understand Japanese cuisine
it's not about using the real thing or something authentic,
it's about what's using fresh, and what's close to you.
Really paying respect to the towah around you.
The idea of importing these goods
was the antithesis of Japanese food to me.
So in a way, we started cooking real Japanese food.
Because we were making all our own products.
The results were astounding, a holy shit moment.
Hopefully you'll taste that outside.
These products did not fall into our laps,
they were a lot of work over four years
of research and development and currently used
in restaurants around the country.
The Lab was given the freedom to fail,
fail big, you know? Really fail big.
And the space to refine as they went.
The freedom to create this type of structure
to understand and to evolve is the only way
Momofuku, my cooks, can evolve.
Preserving that as an environment is out number one goal.
As a chef, you learn to salt to taste.
Everyone's cooked here, everyone's salted something,
and you taste as you go, and you taste,
and you dress seasoning, you taste and you dress seasoning.
Eventually, it becomes intuition.
No one is born with it, you learn from over seasoning,
and you learn from under seasoning.
My role as a chef now is to not provide the tools
to measure exactly how much salt,
because there's some restaurants that measure
exactly to the milligram, you know.
I want to create that intuition
where people feel like they're in that structure
and chaos, and I think in that dichotomy
they're going to be able to know what really great food is.
And when new cooks ask me how much salt
they need to add to a dish, I tell them to over season
and under season, at the same time.
I try to apply that paradox to everything that we do.
Thank you very much.
(audience cheers and applauds)
Bjarke Ingels Will Make You Believe in the Power of Architecture
Adam Savage on His Lifelong Obsession With Recreating Movie Props
An Aerospace Whiz Shows Off a Space Suit Made for Mars
What a Sex Toy Start-Up Taught Ethan Imboden About Design
What Power Plant Software Can Learn From Consumer Apps Like iTunes
These Incredible High-Tech Exhibits Are the Future of Museums
Radical Ideas for Reinventing College, From Stanford's D.School
How Metaphors Make Us Love Some Designs and Not Others
Designing a Brand That Even Non-Designers Can Work With
David Chang Shares the Secrets Behind Momofuku's Delicious Success
How Christina Tosi Redesigned Your Favorite Desserts
Peek Inside an Alcoholic Archaeologist's Wild New Bar
A Photographer's Quest for the Perfect Space Shuttle Shot
Golden Rules for Successful Collaborations, From Star Hotel Designers
Capturing The Invisible World of Technology With Graphic Design
Designing a Brand to Help Kill Malaria
A Game Designer Explains the Counterintuitive Secret to Fun
A Band's Obsessive Ode to the Compact Disc
Writer and Director Jeff Nichols on Finding a Point of View